
The Manchester mayor is tapping into deep public frustration over the water industry but at some stage he needs to say what he means
There ought to be a rule to oblige politicians advocating “stronger public control” of an essential service or sector to say what, precisely, they mean. Public “ownership” is easy to understand – it’s nationalisation. But Andy Burnham, when he cites water and energy as targets for greater public control, seems to imply something else. What?
Would he, for instance, torpedo the government’s current plans for water, notably the “once-in-a-generation” reset of regulation in England and Wales via the clean water bill due in the autumn? Or is he merely saying Thames Water should be tipped into special administration, which may happen anyway without a shove from a new prime minister?
Continue reading...United Kingdom
EUROPE
Related News
Germany news: National team won't win World Cup, fans think
18h ago
Pigeons' livers may enable magnetic navigation when the sun doesn't shine, study finds
18h ago

Paddleboard firm owner who caused four deaths has bid to cut sentence refused
20h ago

Former student charged after University of Surrey crossbow attack
21h ago
Can Hawaii wean itself of oil imports?
18h ago