
Instead of romanticising a pre-AI past, universities should use this moment to rethink what they actually want students to demonstrate, says Dr Nafisa Baba-Ahmed
The frustration many academics are expressing about artificial intelligence and critical thinking is understandable (‘I wish I could push ChatGPT off a cliff’: professors scramble to save critical thinking in an age of AI, 10 March). But from my experience working with students on academic writing, blaming AI risks masking a problem that universities have lived with for years.
In my work with students, I have long seen the ways in which thinking can be outsourced when assessment allows it: essay mills, shared past papers, model essays passed between cohorts, or heavy reliance on tutors and friends to structure assignments. Artificial intelligence did not invent this behaviour. It has simply industrialised a shortcut that already existed.
Continue reading...United Kingdom
EUROPE
Related News

Inside the ‘Vanity Fair’ Oscar party, where Madonna whispered to Brad Pitt and Courtney Love’s manager was banned
6d ago

‘Sold out’ as a fictional story: How the music industry learned to sell success even when it didn’t exist
1d ago

Philippines, the call‑center capital: Taking a deluge of calls for under $2 an hour
2d ago

By your command, my robot: AI war games spark debate about ethical limits
1d ago

Oil, the crisis crushing Cuba and giving Trump new leverage
2d ago